sort by

filter by


2049


2048

2047


2046


2045

2044

2043

2042


2041


2040


2039

2038


2037

2036


2035


2034

2033

2032

2031


2030

2029

2028

2027


2026


2025

2024


2023



























































2020

Bachelor Visual Communication

2020

Dagny Vogely

paradigmaverandering

Designers should stop emphasizing obvious choices and instead entice people to make other choices that improve society. There are enough people who want to make a difference for a better world. But if you only protest in the demarcated and intended places or vote once every four years or sign various petitions, this will not bring the necessary change. All knowledge and technology is already available
for a better world. We know what to do and yet, it doesn’t happen. Designers have an important role in facilitating a paradigm shift. If designers want to facilitate a change in meaning, designers have to do something different. That is why I want to give designers the tools and possibilities to facilitate paradigm shifts.

My project is based on theoretical and experimental research.

Theoretical research has focused on social constructs and the
building blocks of a paradigm shift. As a designer you facilitate
the environment and context in which choices are made. This
environment and context are formed by the social construct and the current paradigm. A designer needs to understand the social construct and paradigm, to facilitate changes in it. Several steps can lead people to making bad choices. If the different steps can tempt people to make worse choices, they could also tempt people to make better choices. Theoretical, instrumental and experimental research together lay the foundation for a paradigm shift. If one of the three types of research are missing, the new paradigm is usually not
considered a possible new normal.

I conducted the experimental research through Design Thinking and co-creation. I discovered new perspectives, designers and knowledge. When the circumstances (the corona crisis) still allowed it, I was working several days every week at the Cube Design Museum and Groenergras. The last few weeks I have agreed online with the designers, researchers and stakeholders. I regularly organized presentations together with the CUBE design lab team, in which we critically assessed each other’s work and went through the next steps in everyone’s process. I was able to improve my work through
interviews and prototyping.Co-creation, experiment and play are different parts that are necessary in the design process if you want to facilitate a paradigm change. However, these are often forgotten and/or skipped by many designers. During the process I found out that a designer wants to facilitate a paradigm change, it is important that you tempt people to make better choices.

My experimental research has shown that it is important to be physically present. As a designer, you should view the old paradigm as a jungle of possibilities. It is important to go on a safari and experience the problems and obstacles people face when changing (or not wanting to change) a paradigm. You cannot do the future design alone, so it is important to
collaborate with stakeholders and experts.

I have designed a compass who helps designers facilitate a paradigm shift. By mapping out the different opportunities and possibilities required for a paradigm change. I visualized these possibilities in a metaphorical compass that serves as a roadmap for the process.The direction of the director will be different for every paradigm change. I have strived that my thesis is a playful collaboration between image and typography with a focus on detail, color and material. A map that gives direction to designers who want to change meaning.

I developed my direction giver to help designers see that they can be the architects of their own choices and contribute to a better world. My direction giver will help designers take the right steps. The route will be different for every paradigmatic change. It will make designers more conscious of the various obstacles and opportunities in relation to the changing of the significance, for example. This way, I hope to offer designers tools during the process of a paradigmatic change. It is important that we reflect on the choices we make and no longer remain passive when faced with evil. Society cannot do without design. Designers must take responsibility for social choices. Therefore, let us opt for a better world together by using design as a vehicle for change.











































































































2013


2012

2011


2010

2009


2008


2007

2006

2005

2004


2003


2001


2000

1999


1998

1997


1996


1995

1994

1992


1991



1989

1988


1987

1986


1985


1984

1983

1982

1981


1979

1978

1977


1976


1975

1974


1973

1972


1971


1970


1969

1968

1967


1965


1964

1963


1962

1961


1960

1959


1958


1957

1956

1955

1954


1953


1952

1951


1950

1949


1948

1947



1945

1944

1943

1942


1941





1935



1929

1928

1927


1926


1925

1924


1923

1922


1921


1920


1919

1918

1917

1916


1915


1914

1913


1912

1911


1909


1908


1907

1906

1905

1904


1903


1902

1901


1900

1899


1897


1896


1894

1893

1892


1891


1890


1889

1888


1887

1886


1885


1884

1883

1882

1881


1880

1879

1878

1877


1876


1875

1874


1873

1872


1871


1870


1869

1868

1867

1866


1865


1864

1863


1862

1861


1860

1859


1858


1857

1856

1855

1854


1853


1852

1851


1850

1849


1848

1847


1846


1845

1843

1842


1841


1840


1839

1838


1837

1836


1835


1834

1833

1832

1831


1829

1828

1827



1824


Maastricht Institute of Arts